Since its formation in 1922, the Motion Picture Association
of America, or MPAA, has gotten a lot of scrutiny from filmmakers and patrons
alike. It has always been judged for acting as a monopoly for the
largest and most successful studios in Hollywood. This is partially why it was created, to help further the
business ventures and interests of the original three studios who formed the
organization. One of the policies the MPAA quickly adopted was the Motion
Picture Production Code, or “Hays Code” nicknamed this for head of the MPAA at
the time, Will H. Hays. This system helped determine what was acceptable or
unacceptable to show in films. If a film was deemed as
unacceptable, the material in question either had to be edited out, or it would
not be properly distributed.
The Code was amended in 1968 and replaced with the modern
day rating system. Not only did this new system deem what was proper material
for films, but also, it determined the age range best suited to attend the
film. This was helpful because it gave filmmakers the option to make a conscious
decision to make adult, or R-rated films, and not have the looming fear of
rejection by the MPAA because it did not suit everyone’s needs. Though this was also
trying because the MPAA became very cautious and stern about what levels of
sexual and violent content were acceptable for each rating.
The MPAA has always been notorious for allowing harsher
levels of violence to be seen as opposed to highly sexual content or extremely
harsh language. Many of the films that have managed to wiggle around the rating
board have had to fight for years in order not to edit their content. There is
an excellent documentary about this flaw in the rating system aptly named This Film is Not Yet Rated. Many have
always felt that films should be judged more harshly based on the level of
violence as opposed to sexual content, as this is a normal function of life,
while violence seems to have a more negative affect on impressionable
individuals.
The MPAA’s other large campaign has been its anti-piracy
work that began in the early 1980’s. This is to help stop copyright
infringement, and more recently file sharing. This helps protect the rights of the
filmmakers and artists, and helps try to funnel money back into the industry. While
piracy may be a cost-free and effective way to get movies in very little time,
it robs theaters and the entire movie industry of valuable revenue needed to
keep the entertainment industry functioning. While this campaign has been
successful overall, it has caused uproar with the young, modern generation, as
more file sharing sites are being taken off the internet and closed for good.
While the MPAA has been doing its share to help keep piracy
down and inform the general public about what content may or may not be
suitable for them and their children to watch, many argue it is not necessary.
There are those out there who believe that the MPAA is just a monopoly of
production companies trying to keep as much money as they can within
themselves, and that parents should be informed and do research on their own
to be able to judge what movies their family can see. While it has
been highly controversial since it’s founding, it is unlikely that the MPAA or
its rating system will be shut down any time soon.
No comments:
Post a Comment